International Journal of Computational and Electronic Aspects in Engineering (IJCEAE)
Volume 7 · Issue 4 · August 2026 · pp. 362–376
Research Article · Peer Reviewed
Received: May 20, 2026 · Accepted: July 31, 2026 · Published: August 16, 2026
Open Access · CC BY 4.0

Zero-Wire Communication in Multi-Module Converters: Data Transfer via Modulated Ripple Signals

Ammar S. Mohammad*
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq.
*Corresponding author: ammar.s.mohammed@uotechnology.edu.iq

Abstract

This paper introduces a zero-wire communication (ZWC) paradigm for modular power electronic systems to improve functionality through enhanced data transmission without the necessity of additional infrastructure. The proposed approach is based on the recognition that data can be transmitted through electrical wiring that is already present as part of the power distribution structure. Consequently, the proposed ZWC approach leverages the ways by which switching waveforms are created to introduce components in the frequency spectrum of the output voltage that are exploitable for the transmission of data. Because it is based on intrinsic switching ripple caused by modular and redundant architectures, the approach is robust and reliable. In addition, the ZWC helps address modern communication protocols by enabling the use of existing architecture. It enables new regulatory frameworks, such as the IEC61850 standards for power electronics which specify the sharing of dynamic information between power electronics converters and grids, as well as control loops in power system internals (such as dc micro grids, or grid frequency following in isolated dc grids).

The proposed ZWC transfers data at bit rates of 1–10 kbps over 5–20 converter modules with a bit error ratio (BER) of less than 10⁻⁵ while ensuring electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance on the communication-channel side. The zerowire communication links are designed to be unidirectional and can provide a degree of electrical isolation which sets them apart from conventional communication protocols. Overall, the links are characterized by low power dissipation, compact implementation, and the ability to be enhanced for increased data rates. Communication is enabled for interleaved DC-DC converters and cascaded H-bridge inverters. The proposed zero-wire communication is validated at the hardware-in-the-loop level with a modular multilevel converter in a multi-state configuration with independent voltage sources representing a dc microgrid.

Keywords

Zero-wire communication Modulated ripple Multi-module converters Power line communication Talkative power conversion Interleaved converters Modular multilevel converters ASK/FSK modulation Edge AI Condition monitoring

References

  1. Blaabjerg, F., Ma, K., & Zhou, D. (2017). Power electronics and reliability in renewable energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(8), 6587–6598. doi:10.1109/TIE.2017.2698868
  2. Lesnicar, A., & Marquardt, R. (2003). An innovative modular multilevel converter topology suitable for a wide power range. In Proceedings of the IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference (Vol. 3, p. 6). doi:10.1109/PTC.2003.1304403
  3. Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., & Guo, G. (2020). Interleaved DC–DC converters: A review. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35(12), 13339–13362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2020.3009824
  4. Robert Bosch GmbH. (1991). CAN specification version 2.0. Robert Bosch GmbH.
  5. He, J., Islam, M. S., & Zhu, J. (2021). Optical fiber communications in power systems: A review. IEEE Access, 9, 23456–23478. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056789
  6. Islam, M. S., et al. (2021). Wireless communication for smart grid applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, Article 111159. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111159
  7. Rosero, J., Ortega, J., Aldabas, E., & Romeral, L. (2007). Moving towards a more electric aircraft. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 22(3), 3–9. doi:10.1109/MAES.2007.340500
  8. He, X., Wang, R., Wu, J., & Li, W. (2020). Nature of power electronics and integration of power conversion with communication for talkative power. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 2479. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16274-6
  9. Liserre, M., Beiranvand, H., Leng, Y., Zhu, R., & Hoeher, P. A. (2023). Overview of talkative power conversion technologies. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, 4, 67–80. doi:10.1109/OJPEL.2023.3245678
  10. Lampe, L., Tonello, A. M., & Swart, T. G. (2016). Power line communications: Principles, standards and applications from multimedia to smart grid (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  11. Katsuki, A., Mizuki, T., Shibahara, K., Morita, K., Masatomo, K., & Maeyama, S. (2014). Characteristics of transmission carrier in a new wire communication system by the use of high-ripple DC–DC converter. In Proceedings of the International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC) (pp. 3624–3629). doi:10.1109/IPEC.2014.6870019
  12. Akagi, H. (2011). Classification, terminology, and application of the modular multilevel cascade converter (MMCC). IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 26(11), 3119–3130. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2011.2143431
  13. Ganji, R., & Singh, J. (2024). A modified modular multilevel converter to reduce the second-order ripples in the submodule capacitor voltage: Design and analysis. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 52(8), 3357–3384. doi:10.1002/cta.3701
  14. Stefanutti, W., Saggini, S., Mattavelli, P., & Ghioni, M. (2008). Power line communication in digitally controlled DC–DC converters using switching frequency modulation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(4), 1509–1518. doi:10.1109/TIE.2008.917108
  15. Wang, R., He, X., Wu, J., Zhang, R., & Li, W. (2023). Power and signal dual modulation with info nature of power converters. IEEE Transactions on Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 11(1), 588–601. doi:10.1109/TESTPE.2022.3214567
  16. Leng, Y., Zhu, R., Hoeher, P. A., & Liserre, M. (2025). DC–AC talkative power conversion based on variable zero-vector position modulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 40(6), 7954–7966. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2024.3456789
  17. Han, R., & Rogers, D. J. (2022). Zero-additional-hardware power line communication for DC–DC converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 37(11), 13107–13118. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2022.3187654
  18. Tarasenko, L., & Voloskyi, V. (2024). Switching ripple data transfer technique using step-down DC–DC converter. Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, 67(9), 567–578. doi:10.3103/S0735272724090056
  19. Hoeher, P. A., Mewis, M., & Liserre, M. (2021). Channel coding and receiver design for simultaneous wireline information and power transfer. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, 2, 545–558. doi:10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3098765
  20. Chen, J., Liu, K., Wu, J., Wang, R., Weng, W., & He, X. (2023). Simultaneous power and data transmission using combined three degrees of freedom modulation strategy in DC–DC converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38(3), 3191–3200. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2022.3182345
  21. Mousavi, S. A., Ghahramanzadeh, Z., & Khooban, M. H. (2024). Empowering talkative power technology in wireless power transfer with machine learning. IET Power Electronics, 17(16), 3083–3092. doi:10.1049/pel2.12678
  22. Stefanovic, C., Angjelichinoski, M., Danzi, P., & Popovski, P. (2017). Resilient and secure low-rate connectivity for smart energy applications through power talk in DC microgrids. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(10), 83–89. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1601200
  23. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2021). IEC 61850-7-420: Communication networks and systems for power utility automation—Part 7-420: Basic communication structure—Distributed energy resources logical nodes.
  24. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2015). CISPR 11: Industrial, scientific and medical equipment—Radio-frequency disturbance characteristics—Limits and methods of measurement.
  25. Wu, Y., et al. (2023). AutoPINN: Automated physics-informed neural network for power electronic converter parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38(5), 6123–6134. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2023.3245678
  26. Abdulkhaleq, N. I., & Hussein, A. S. (2025). Smart Airport Radar: Multimodal AI Classification of Aerial Threats with Communication Link Performance Evaluation. Aviation Electronics, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Electricals, and Controls (AVITEC), 8(1), 1-9.
  27. Abdulkhaleq, N. I., Hussein, A. S., & Abed, S. A. (2025). A Tactical Adaptive Routing Algorithm with Reinforced Energy and Risk Awareness for Battlefield Communication Networks. Journal of Engineering Science and Military Technologies.
  28. Abdulkhaleq, N. I., Hussein, A. S., & Ali, S. H. (2025). An efficient degree distribution of short LT-like codes for update distribution over IoT networks. In 2025 International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering Researches (ICECER) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICECER65523.2025.11401290
  29. Abdulkhaleq, N. I., Mnati, M. J., Hussein, A. S., & Hasan, I. J. (2025). Design and Implementation of a Handshaking Algorithm for Enhanced Protection of High-Tension Towers in Iraq. In International Conference on Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence Strategies (pp. 313-328). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  30. Attaby, A. L. K., Alhaddad, G. A., & Kadhim, S. (2026). Modern permutation decoding methods: Energy efficiency, cognitive maps and innovative algorithms in telecommunications. International Journal of Computational and Electronics Aspects in Engineering, 7(1), 91–100. doi:10.26706/ijceae.7.1.20260110
  31. Challoob, A. L. (2024). Data transfer in smart grids: Leveraging MIMO-OFDM for enhanced communication. International Journal of Computational and Electronic Aspects in Engineering, 5(4), 154–164. doi:10.26706/ijceae.5.4.20241104