Optimization Techniques for Machining Process Parameters in Manufacturing Engineering

Manish T. Shete, Alokkumar A. Uplap
International Journal of Analytical, Experimental and Finite Element Analysis
Volume 9: issue 4, December 2022, pp 76-85


Author's Information

Manish T. Shete1 

Corresponding Author
1Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Amravati
mtshete82@gmail.com

Alokkumar A. Uplap2

2Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Nagpur

Technical Paper -- Peer Reviewed
Published online – 20 November 2022

Open Access Technical Paper under Creative Commons License

Cite this Technical Paper – Manish T. Shete, Alokkumar A. Uplap, “Optimization Techniques for Machining Process Parameters in Manufacturing Engineering”, International Journal of Analytical, Experimental and Finite Element Analysis, RAME Publishers, vol. 9, issue 4, pp. 76-85, December 2022.
https://doi.org/10.26706/ijaefea.4.9.20221203


Abstract:-
The optimization of machining process parameters plays a critical role in enhancing productivity, product quality, and cost efficiency in manufacturing engineering. With increasing demand for high precision and sustainable production, numerous optimization techniques have been developed to determine optimal combinations of machining parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut. This Technical Paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of various optimization techniques applied in machining processes, highlighting their effectiveness, advantages, and limitations. The study covers classical methods such as the Taguchi technique and response surface methodology, as well as advanced approaches including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, artificial neural networks, and hybrid optimization models. A systematic review of recent literature has been conducted to examine the application of these techniques in different machining operations such as turning, milling, and drilling. The findings indicate that advanced optimization methods, particularly hybrid and AI-based techniques, offer superior performance in handling complex, multi-objective optimization problems compared to traditional approaches. However, challenges such as computational complexity, requirement of large datasets, and implementation difficulties remain significant concerns. This paper contributes by presenting a structured comparison of optimization techniques and identifying research gaps for future exploration. The outcomes of this review provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners to select appropriate optimization strategies for improving machining performance and achieving efficient manufacturing processes.
Index Terms:-
Machining Optimization, Taguchi Method, Genetic Algorithm, Response Surface Methodology, Artificial Intelligence, Manufacturing Engineering .
REFERENCES
    1. G. C. Onwubolu and F. Rayegani, “Characterization and optimization of mechanical properties of ABS parts manufactured by the fused deposition modelling process,” Int. J. Manuf. Eng., vol. 2014, pp. 1–13, 2014.
    2. K. Gupta and M. K. Gupta, Optimization of Manufacturing Processes. Springer, 2020.
    3. R. Sureban, V. N. Kulkarni, and V. N. Gaitonde, “Modern optimization techniques for advanced machining processes–A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 18, pp. 3034–3042, 2019.
    4. J. E. Ribeiro, M. B. César, and H. Lopes, “Optimization of machining parameters to improve the surface quality,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 5, pp. 355–362, 2017.
    5. N. S. Patel, P. L. Parihar, and J. S. Makwana, “Parametric optimization to improve the machining process by using Taguchi method: a review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 47, pp. 2709–2714, 2021.
    6. S. Chakraborty, B. Bhattacharyya, and S. Diyaley, “Applications of optimization techniques for parametric analysis of non-traditional machining processes: a review,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 467–494, 2019.
    7. K. S. Sangwan, S. Saxena, and G. Kant, “Optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using integrated ANN-GA approach,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 29, pp. 305–310, 2015.
    8. G. Kant and K. S. Sangwan, “Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surface roughness in machining,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 83, pp. 151–164, 2014.
    9. G. Campatelli, L. Lorenzini, and A. Scippa, “Optimization of process parameters using a response surface method for minimizing power consumption in the milling of carbon steel,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 66, pp. 309–316, 2014.
    10. M. A. Mellal and E. J. Williams, “Parameter optimization of advanced machining processes using cuckoo optimization algorithm and hoopoe heuristic,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 927–942, 2016.
    11. M. K. Gupta, P. K. Sood, and V. S. Sharma, “Machining parameters optimization of titanium alloy using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization under minimum-quantity lubrication environment,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 1671–1682, 2016.
    12. C. Camposeco-Negrete, “Optimization of cutting parameters using Response Surface Method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 91, pp. 109–117, 2015.
    13. S. J. S. Chelladurai et al., “Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 37, pp. 1301–1304, 2021.
    14. V. Nasir and J. Cool, “A review on wood machining: characterization, optimization, and monitoring of the sawing process,” Wood Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020.
    15. B. K. Lodhi and S. Agarwal, “Optimization of machining parameters in WEDM of AISI D3 steel using Taguchi technique,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 14, pp. 194–199, 2014.
    16. M. T. Bhoskar et al., “Genetic algorithm and its applications to mechanical engineering: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 2, no. 4–5, pp. 2624–2630, 2015.
    17. D. Weichert et al., “A review of machine learning for the optimization of production processes,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1889–1902, 2019.
    18. M. Sarıkaya, H. Dilipak, and A. Gezgin, “Optimization of process parameters for surface roughness and tool life in face milling using the Taguchi Analysis,” 2015.
    19. V. K. Vankanti and V. Ganta, “Optimization of process parameters in drilling of GFRP composite using Taguchi method,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2014.
    20. L. G. De Oliveira et al., “Response surface methodology for advanced manufacturing technology optimization: theoretical fundamentals, practical guidelines, and survey literature review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1785–1837, 2019.
    21. B. S. Khadar et al., “Multi-objective optimization of process parameters for powder mixed electrical discharge machining of inconel x-750 alloy using Taguchi-TOPSIS approach,” Strojnícky časopis - J. Mech. Eng., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.
    22. T. Muthuramalingam and B. Mohan, “A review on influence of electrical process parameters in EDM process,” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2015.
    23. N. Yuvaraj and M. Pradeep Kumar, “Multiresponse optimization of abrasive water jet cutting process parameters using TOPSIS approach,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 882–889, 2015.
    24. G. Singh and A. Verma, “A Brief Review on injection moulding manufacturing process,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1423–1433, 2017.
    25. O. P. Singh, G. Kumar, and M. Kumar, “Role of Taguchi and grey relational method in optimization of machining parameters of different materials: a review,” Acta Electron. Malaysia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2019.
    26. A. Shukla et al., “Applications of TOPSIS algorithm on various manufacturing processes: a review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 5320–5329, 2017.
    27. M. A. Moghaddam and F. Kolahan, “Modeling and optimization of the electrical discharge machining process based on a combined artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization algorithm,” Sci. Iran. Trans. B, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1206–1217, 2020.
    28. H. El-Hofy, Fundamentals of Machining Processes: Conventional and Nonconventional Processes. CRC Press, 2018.
    29. M. Liberini et al., “Selection of optimal process parameters for wire arc additive manufacturing,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 62, pp. 470–474, 2017.
    30. Jagadish, S. Bhowmik, and A. Ray, “Prediction and optimization of process parameters of green composites in AWJM process using response surface methodology,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1359–1370, 2016.
    31. F. Kolahan and M. A. Moghaddam, “The use of Taguchi method with grey relational analysis to optimize the EDM process parameters with multiple quality characteristics,” Sci. Iran. Trans. B, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 530, 2015.
    32. A. C. S. Reddy et al., “An experimental study on effect of process parameters in deep drawing using Taguchi technique,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2015.
    33. D. Doreswamy et al., “An investigation of abrasive water jet machining on graphite/glass/epoxy composite,” Int. J. Manuf. Eng., vol. 2015, p. 627218, 2015.

    To view full paper, Download here .


Publishing with